Crystallization of Ancient Moon’s Core May Have Driven Its Now-Defunct Magnetic Field

Apr 14, 2017 by News Staff

Crystallization of Moon’s liquid metallic core may have driven its now-lost magnetic field approximately 3 billion years ago, according to new research published in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

Ancient Moon generated a dynamo magnetic field in its liquid metallic core; this dynamo may have been driven by crystallization of the core. Image credit: Hernan Canellas / Benjamin Weiss / MIT.

Ancient Moon generated a dynamo magnetic field in its liquid metallic core; this dynamo may have been driven by crystallization of the core. Image credit: Hernan Canellas / Benjamin Weiss / MIT.

Magnetized rocks returned to Earth during the Apollo missions established that the Moon once had a magnetic field. It lasted for more than a billion years and, at one point, it was as strong as the one generated by modern Earth.

Planetary researchers believe that an early lunar dynamo — Moon’s molten, churning core — may have powered the magnetic field, but previously did not understand how it had been generated and maintained.

A team of researchers from the University of Chicago and NASA’s Johnson Space Center argues that this dynamo was caused by crystallization of the lunar core.

“Our work ties together physical and chemical constraints and helps us understand how the Moon acquired and maintained its magnetic field — a difficult problem to tackle for any inner solar system body,” said study lead author Dr. Kevin Righter, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Johnson Space Center.

The Moon likely had an iron/nickel core with only a small amount of sulfur and carbon, thus giving the lunar core a high melting point.

As a result, the core likely started crystallizing early in lunar history, and the heat released by crystallization may have driven an early magnetic field that is recorded in ancient lunar samples.

“We created several synthetic core compositions based on the latest geochemical data from the Moon, and equilibrated them at the pressures and temperatures of the lunar interior,” Dr. Righter said.

A magnetic field has been recorded in lunar samples as young as 3.1 billion years old, but is currently inactive, indicating that at some point between then and now, the heat flow declined to a point where the lunar dynamo became inactive.

The lunar core is currently thought to be composed of a solid inner and liquid outer core, known from Apollo seismic and other geophysical and spacecraft data.

The new specific lunar core composition proposed by Dr. Righter and co-authors likely would be partially solid and liquid today, consistent with the seismic and geophysical data.

The team prepared powders of iron, nickel, sulfur and carbon based on geochemical proportion estimates of the Moon from recent analyses of Apollo samples. The powders then were encapsulated and heated under pressures corresponding to those in the lunar interior.

Because the Moon may have experienced high temperatures in its early history and lower temperatures during later cooling, the authors investigated a wide range of temperatures.

Detailed compositions and textures of the solids and liquids formed at the higher pressure and temperature conditions were examined.

Before these new results, the conundrum was that modeling of the Moon involved an iron/nickel core with sulfur contents so high (and melting point so low) that crystallization would not have occurred until very late in lunar history. Thus the source of the heat flow out of the core required to drive a dynamo was unclear. Various sources were proposed such as heat from impact or shear forces.

The researchers acknowledge that such sources may be real, but if the heat from crystallization of the outer core is available, it is a simple and straightforward, source for a lunar dynamo and would fit well with the expected timing.

_____

K. Righter et al. 2017. Phase equilibria of a low S and C lunar core: Implications for an early lunar dynamo and physical state of the current core. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 463: 323-332; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.02.003

This article is based on a press-release from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Share This Page